Troubles with Sheep

A surge in livestock in 1640 contributed to some unexpected difficulties.sheep

That year, the General Court in an effort to establish the self-reliance of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, ordered that towns promote the growing of flax, hemp, wool, the spinning and weaving of these fibers, the raising of livestock,  and that no sheep or mutton should be exported.

In 1640, Mark Quilter, an Ipswich man of limited expectations, was employed as one of the town’s three cow-keepers, and was the object of many practical jokes. One evening a couple of young men, Thomas and John Manning, dropped a calf down Mark Quilter’s chimney. Records show that they were reprimanded in court and ordered against “abusing him in his barn and yard” (I am uncertain whether “him” refers to Mark Quilter or the calf).

The Manning boys learned their lesson,and passed such discipline on to their children. A later generation John Manning and Thomas Manning became town leaders. Poor Mark Quilter– well, that’s another story.

The vast quantity of livestock may have also contributed to the first hanging in the colony, a young man charged with sodomy:

hanging_2Thomas Granger was the 16 year old son of Thomas and Grace Granger of Plymouth Plantation, and was a servant to Love Brewster of Duxbury. He was found guilty of having sexual relations with animals in Love’s barn. Granger’s execution on September 8, 1642 was the first in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and perhaps the most bizarre. Despite his young age, Granger was survived by a wife and two children.

Governor William Bradford’s account of the case appears in his book, Of Plimouth Plantation 1620-1647 :

A Horrible Case of Bestiality

“There was a youth whose name was Thomas Granger. He was servant to an honest man of Duxbury, being about 16 or 17 years of age. (His father and mother lived at the same time at Scituate.) He was this year detected of buggery, and indicted for the same, with a mare, a cow, two goats, five sheep, two calves and a turkey. Horrible it is to mention, but the truth of the history requires it.

He was first discovered by one that accidentally saw his lewd practice towards the mare (I forbear particulars). Being upon it examined and committed, in the end he not only confessed the fact with that beast at that time, but sundry times before and at several times with all the rest of the forenamed in his indictment. And this his free confession was not only in private to the magistrates (though at first he strived to deny it) but to sundry, both ministers and others; and afterwards, upon his indictment, to the whole Court and jury; and confirmed it at his execution.

hangingAnd whereas some of the sheep could not so well be known by his description of them, others with them were brought before him and he declared which were they and which were not. And accordingly he was cast by the jury and condemned, and after executed about the 8th of September, 1642.

A very sad spectacle it was. For first the mare and then the cow and the rest of the lesser cattle were killed before his face, according to the law, Leviticus xx.15*. The cattle were all cast into a great and large pit that was digged of purpose for them, and no use made of any part of them.

Upon the examination of this person and also of a former that had made some sodomitical attempts upon another, it being demanded of them how they came first to the knowledge and practice of such wickedness, the one confessed he had long used it in old England; and this youth last spoken of said he was taught it by another that had heard of such things from some in England when he was there, and they kept cattle together, by which it appears how one wicked person may infect many, and what care all ought to have what servants they bring into their families.”

An overabundance of laws

Surely the colony could not continue executing its young men and livestock, so with great speed the court issued another edict, suggested spinning and weaving as suitable occupation for boys and girls to avoid idleness, and also,

  • The “prudential men” of each town are instructed to take care of such children as are set to keep cattle, and that boys and girls be not suffered to converse together so as may occasion any wanton, dishonest or immodest behavior.”
The Spinning Wheel” by Frederick William Jackson

The Spinning Wheel” by Frederick William Jackson

Each new pronouncement by the court created complications which required yet another edict. In 1656 the court ordered the selectmen of all towns to assess households at “one or more spinners” as an adjunct to their regular employment. Each family’s spinner was required to spin for thirty weeks every year, three pounds per week of linen, cotton or woolen.

To secure proper oversight, families were divided into groups or classes of ten, six or five, and a class leader was to be appointed over each group.

In that same year another edict was issued:

“One able person out of every family shall help clear the commons for the better keeping of sheep, upon a day’s warning.”

With a mandated work force for raising sheep and spinning the wool, men who owned large farms became even wealthier. Not only were these orders burdensome to the townspeople, but the proliferation of animals brought new problems that had to be resolved. In 1652 the Town of Ipswich ordered that:

“All dung-hills lying in the streets shall be removed by the 20th of October and from that time noe dung hills are to be laycd in the streets under the penalty of 10s.”

By 1662 the commons on the south side of Ipswich were so burdened that one hundred sheep were transferred to the north side. Men of the greatest sobriety and carefulness were chosen for the responsible duty of viewing and having charge of the rude fence that kept livestock in the commons and out of the gardens. Samuel Hunt often had words with his neighbor John Lee Sr. over the handling of cattle and sheep. In 1668 the two landed in court for disturbing the peace, and a witness testified that John’s son Joseph hit Samuel with a club as they “were wording it over the sheep”

In 1702 the common lands were divided into large sheep pastures, and it was decided that:

“The Great Neck, by some called Jefferies Neck is now named ‘ye Ram Pasture,’ being part of ye sheep walks on ye northerly side of the River.”

Cattle heading back into town on Jeffreys Neck Road

The keeping of cattle and sheep on the Necks, and the hills surrounding the town continued into the early 20th Century. Each spring the cows were driven out Jeffreys Neck Road and then herded back to the village farms in the fall. The hills were all bare of trees, the only foliage being the grass upon which the great herds depended.


Town Hill was used for grazing in the first century, and was later lined with orchards. This orchard was behind Francis Jordan’s house, now the Ipswich Bed and Breakfast, at the intersection of East Street and North Main Street.

* Leviticus 20:15 of the King James Bible: “and if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.” and then he himself was executed.

*Alison Vannah’s thesis, The Crotchets of Division

*(Thomas Franklin Waters, Ipswich in the Massachusetts Bay Colony)

Categories: Stories

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.