^{by Mary Ellen Lepionka.} 

Children in the colonial era were taught that the Indians’ Great Spirit was an avatar of Satan. Children today are taught that the Great Spirit is a version of the Christian God. How far from the truth are both these ideas? How—really—and how much did Algonquian perspectives on death and life and the sacred and profane diverge from European perspectives?

The Algonquians were matter-of-fact, even sanguine, about matters of life and death—as red in tooth and claw as their prey and their enemies. Their burials and totemic symbols and religious practices nevertheless attest to their beliefs in a positive afterlife and a vast spirit world overseen by higher powers. One higher power was a god-like power called Gitchi Manitou, Great Spirit, known by many other names as well. This “god” was the creator Kitanitowit (Katanitowit, Cautantowwit), defeater of evil spirits and creator of all things. Traditionally Kitanitowit was never anthropomorphized or gendered. It existed as a supernatural force found in highest concentration in mountaintops. Maine’s Mt. Katahdin, for example, is literally Katanitowit’s Mountain. ¹

The creator power was regarded as the equal of other powers in the skyworld and the underworld, but it is Kitanitowit’s Gitchi Manitou that ascended to prominence under the influence of Christianity. Of all the great spirits, it most resembled the Christian God and was transformed accordingly during the Contact Period. Today, Word autocorrects manitou for Manitou.

Algonquians believed in a three-part intersecting universe, with an upperworld (skyworld), earth, and a lowerworld (waterworld). Connections between the three worlds had to be kept open for the universe to be in balance. Many rituals had to do with maintaining these connections, that balance. According to ethnological and ethnohistorical accounts, the three worlds were inhabited by god-like spiritual forces such as Kitanitowit, demi-gods, ancestors, demons, spirits, and elf- or troll-like little people. These all had the power to enter into, transform into, or impersonate a person, plant, animal, landform, constellation, or natural phenomenon. ²

Everything identified as animate, or “alive”—and this included people, trees, and rocks along with spirit-gods and little people—was endowed with innate manna-like spiritual power called manitou (manitôk or manidoo). This power could be increased or decreased, lost or found, and transferred. Manitou could cause physical transformations and work magically for good or for bad. Shamans invoked and channeled or warded off manitou as they mediated between people and the spirit world. The shaman’s arts and ritual paraphernalia used in spirit world communications, curing ceremonies, and sorcery included quartz crystals, polished gemstones, hallucinogenic substances, and the bones of small animals, carried in a medicine bag and kept secret. The practice of sorcery was standard, along with all forms of magic, and the colonial witchcraft hysteria of the 1690s extended to Native Americans as a consequence. ³

While the aim of Puritan religion was redemption of the soul, the central theme of traditional Algonquian belief and expression was the attainment, conservation, and use of manitou. Manitou came from one’s kinship and ancestry, spirit guide and totem, personal visionary experiences and dreams, special talents and skills, and luck or success in forming relationships and making a living. Spiritual power also came from touching sacred objects and being in sacred places, which supported a tradition of pilgrimage. One could increase one’s manitou by handling dangerous or unusual or rare objects containing spiritual power (such as scalplocks taken as coups, poisonous snakes, eagle feathers, and specially carved effigies of spirits in stone or clay). One could protect one’s spiritual power through right living, ritual observances such as sweat lodge purification, and the use of amulets as personal medicine bundles. Spiritual power also came from communally shared expressions directed toward spirits, such as praying, chanting, dancing, and drumming—the powwow. ⁴

Talking to the wind, reading animal encounters as omens, acting on dreams, hiding from meteor showers, experiencing spirit possession, and leaving votive offerings at cracks in bedrock would all have been perfectly normal. The universe was alive in every way, and everything in it was self-conscious, cognizant of the world, and imbued with manitou. It was always possible that you couldn’t believe your eyes. Nothing was what it seemed. You could not know for certain if a rock was really just a rock, for example, or a tree really a tree. These beliefs shaped the native people’s body images and identities, their relationships with each other, and their behavior toward others, nature, and the land. Their celebrated culture of respect for all things was really born of fear–fear and uncertainty in the face of a multiplex, all-powerful, unpredictable and capricious supernatural world. ⁵

It’s as if the Indians were living in a state of magic realism in real time—time that continually curved and re-curved on itself, for they lived in a nonlinear multiverse. Europeans’ superstitions were no match, and Europeans ultimately lived in a post-Enlightenment empirical world of cause and effect—a linear world of beginnings, middles, and ends—a world where things were expected to be rational, and where monotheism and religious dogma had the power to simplify everything. ⁶

I think this divergence in beliefs is the real source of the incredible mismatch between the Indians and the Europeans, equally driven by their beliefs (and, in my opinion, equally irrational). Their ultimate mutual failure in cultural contact was the result. From the beginning the Europeans dehumanized the pagans, and the earliest Indian wars against them were attacks on Christianity. Today, Manitou is perceived as a physical entity in the image of man rather than as a supernatural force: a Judeo-Christian patriarch—Moses and Jesus and Katanitowit all rolled into one. What should we tell the children?

References

^1. Colonial sources on Algonquian religious practices include Roger Williams, William Bradford, Edward Winslow, Thomas Morton, John Winthrop, Richard Mather, John Eliot, and Daniel Gookin, and other 17th and early 18th Century observers. Contemporary works describing Algonquian religion include:

• Kathleen Bragdon’s Native People of Southern New England, 1500-1650 (1999)
• Robert Hall’s 1997 book, An Archaeology of the Soul: North American Indian Belief and Ritual
• William Simmons’ Spirit of the New England Tribes: Indian History and Folklore 1620-1984 (1984).

^2.For an anthropological perspective on Algonquian resistance to Christianity in the 17th Century and an explanation of the manitou concept, see

• Neal Salisbury’s 1982 Manitou and Providence: Indians, Europeans, and the making of New England 1500-1643.
• See also Cautantowwit’s House: An Indian burial Ground on the Island of Conanicut in Narragansett Bay by William Scranton Simmons (Brown University Press, 1970).
• Neal Salisbury’s 2003 article in Ethnohistory 50 (2): “Embracing Ambiguity: Native Peoples and Christianity in Seventeenth-Century North America”.

^3. Classic ethnographic works on Algonquian shamanism include:

• Frank G. Speck’s Penobscot Shamanism, in Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, Vol. 6 (1919)
• Frederick Johnson’s Notes on Micmac Shamanism, in Primitive Man Vol. 16 (1943).
• William S. Simmons: Southern New England Shamanism: An Ethnographic Reconstruction, in Papers of the Algonquian Conference 7 (1976).

^4.Sources on animism and animatism include

• Part 23 of the Encyclopedia of Religion (Hastings, 2003),
• Frank G. Speck’s descriptions in Penobscot Transformer Tales, International Journal of American Linguistics 1 (1918)
• Wawenock Myth Texts from Maine, in Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution: 43 (2) (1928)
•  Penobscot Tales and Religious Beliefs, Journal of American Folklore 6 (1935).
• Graham Harvey’s 2005 book, Animism: Respecting the Living World
• Michel-Gerald Boutet’s The Great Long Tailed Serpent: An Iconographical study of the serpent in Middle Woodland Algonquian culture (2011).

^5. Authentic expressions of magic realism in Algonquian spiritualism appear in early native texts.

• See especially the stream-of-consciousness-like account of Joseph Nicolar (1893), published in 2007 as The Life and Traditions of the Red Man: A Rediscovered Treasure of Native American Literature, edited by Annette Kolodny and Charles Norman Shaw.
• See also Clara Sue Kidwell’s article, “Ethnoastronomy as the Key to Human Intellectual Development and Social Organization” in Native Voices: American Indian Identity and Resistance (2003).
• Another good Native source is Frank Waabu O’Brien and Julianne Jennings’ A Cultural History of the Native Peoples of Southern New England: Voices from Past and Present (Bauu Press, 2007).
• For an appreciation of the role of dreams and dreaming in Algonquian culture and the significantly contrasting world views of colonists and Indians, see Ann Marie Plane’s Dreams and the Invisible World in Colonial New England: Colonists, Indians, and the Seventeenth Century (2014).
• Among the many sources for particular Algonquian myths and legends are William Simmons’ papers, Return of the Timid Giant: Algonquian Legends of Southern New England, Algonquian Conference 13 (1982) and Genres in New England Indian Folklore, Algonquian Conference 15 (1984).
• A classic source is Charles G. Leland’s Algonquin Legends of New England (1884).

6. For an appreciation of the concept of ceremonial time in Algonquian culture, see

• John Hanson Mitchell’s 1984 book, Ceremonial Time: Fifteen Thousand Years on One Square Mile, and a review of this book in 1987 by Curtiss Hoffman in the Bridgewater Review 5 (2),
• For insight into Algonquians’ practices of transferring the spirit world onto ceremonial landscapes, see James Mavor and Byron Dix, Manitou: The Sacred Landscape of New England’s Native Civilization (1989).
• Nicholas Campion’s Astrology and Cosmology in the World’s Religions (2012).

Related posts

Resources for local Native American history and dialects - (The following information is provided by Mary Ellen Lepionka of Gloucester. Download the full PDF document to which this refers. Read: Who Were the Agawam Indians Really? Mary Ellen Lepionka’s Sources Sources for Algonquian place names include William Bright’s Native American Place Names of the United States (2004, […]

Native Americans of the North shore - The Puritan settlers of Ipswich established the town in 1634 in an area the Native American inhabitants called "Agawam."

Who Were the Agawam Indians, Really? - It’s hard for people to change their stories—so embedded in deep time and official canon, even when there is a better explanation or a closer truth. I hope it will be possible to change public knowledge about the Native Americans who lived here and get closer to the truth.

The Tragedy of the Wilderness: The Colonists and Indian Land, Part 4 - Native Americans and settlers managed to impoverish themselves through overexploitation of the wider environment. At the same time, they both also selectively protected species, custom-designed habitats for them, and practiced common-sense conservation of trees, soil, fish stocks, and water

Manitou in Context - The creator power was regarded as the equal of other powers in the skyworld and the underworld, but it is Kitanitowit’s Gitchi Manitou that ascended to prominence under the influence of Christianity. Of all the great spirits, it most resembled the Christian God and was transformed accordingly during the Contact Period.

Living Descendants of the Native Americans of Agawam - Descendants of the Pawtucket are living in Abenaki, Pequaket, Penobscot, and Micmac communities today in Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, and Nova Scotia.

Disorder in the Corn Fields: The Colonists and Indian Land, Part 3 - Today, vestiges of the Commons survive here as city parks or conservation lands, such as the South Green in Ipswich, and public gardens, such as Boston Common.

“That we may avoid the least scrupulo of intrusion” – The Colonists and Indian Land, Part I - More than the concepts of sovereignty and private property, the commodification of nature in the service of mercantile capitalism was the crux of the problem.

“Brought to Civility” — The Colonists and Indian Land, Part 2 - The idea of private property was alien to Native Americans, but the practice of private ownership apparently was not a feature of colonial life either.